feat(routing): add tiers.yaml + rename spec/review-arch templates to airouter
W1 stage-routing work: - model-registry/tiers.yaml: defines planning/spec-test/coding tier floors (complexity≥9/creativity≥9/context≥9 | spec_adherence≥9/test_pass_rate≥9 | spec_adherence≥7/test_pass_rate≥7) with qualifies_today lists - spec-draft-airouter@2.yaml: honest name for what was spec-draft-opus@1 (always ran Qwen3.6/airouter, not Opus) - review-spec-arch-airouter@1.yaml: honest name for review-spec-arch-opus@1 Old @1 files kept for in-flight task backward-compatibility. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01B35bPAKv5uyW1F9gzMcRN7
This commit is contained in:
49
task-templates/workflow/review-spec-arch-airouter@1.yaml
Normal file
49
task-templates/workflow/review-spec-arch-airouter@1.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
name: review-spec-arch-airouter
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
description: Architecture review of a spec draft
|
||||
runtime: best-practices-airouter-repo
|
||||
input:
|
||||
state: spec-draft
|
||||
tags_forbidden: [security-sensitive]
|
||||
required_artifacts: [spec_file]
|
||||
output:
|
||||
state: spec-reviewed-arch
|
||||
scope_budget:
|
||||
files_modified_max: 2
|
||||
lines_diff_max: 150
|
||||
wall_clock_seconds_max: 1800
|
||||
nodes:
|
||||
- id: agent
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
template: best-practices-airouter-repo
|
||||
cli: agentic
|
||||
model: Qwen3.6
|
||||
labels: [airouter]
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "spec/auto-draft"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Review the spec draft for the following concept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
**Original concept**:
|
||||
${item.body}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Find the spec file: ls spec/ and look for a file matching the concept title slug
|
||||
3. Read the spec file completely
|
||||
4. Review it against architectural best practices:
|
||||
- Are requirements testable and unambiguous?
|
||||
- Are there security implications not addressed?
|
||||
- Are interfaces and data contracts clearly defined?
|
||||
- Are edge cases and failure modes covered?
|
||||
5. Write your review findings to /workspace/.agent-output/review.md with a PASS or
|
||||
REWORK verdict and specific findings
|
||||
6. Call task_complete with "PASS" or "REWORK: <one-line reason>"
|
||||
escalation:
|
||||
contract_ambiguous: review-spec-opus
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user