feat(templates): sync 4 workflow templates from agent-runtimes
Add direct-impl-sonnet@1, plan-review-loop@1, spec-review-loop@1, test-write-review-loop@1 — present in agent-runtimes but missing here. These are needed before agent-runtimes drops its baked-in copies and the CP loads workflow templates exclusively from this CRS repo.
This commit is contained in:
Paul O'Reilly
47
task-templates/workflow/direct-impl-sonnet@1.yaml
Normal file
47
task-templates/workflow/direct-impl-sonnet@1.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
name: direct-impl-sonnet
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Direct Sonnet implementation for items with a well-defined scope that skip
|
||||
the spec/test/scaffold pipeline. The item description IS the spec; the agent
|
||||
implements all scope items, runs the project build to verify, and commits.
|
||||
Use for design-coherence, refactoring, or clearly-scoped multi-file tasks.
|
||||
runtime: sonnet-impl-narrow
|
||||
input:
|
||||
state: ready
|
||||
tags_required: []
|
||||
tags_forbidden: [security-sensitive, algorithmic-large]
|
||||
required_artifacts: []
|
||||
output:
|
||||
state: impl-complete
|
||||
scope_budget:
|
||||
files_modified_max: 20
|
||||
lines_diff_max: 500
|
||||
wall_clock_seconds_max: 3600
|
||||
nodes:
|
||||
- id: agent
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
template: code-sonnet-tdd-repo
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "task/${item.uuid}"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
Implement the scope described in this work item. The description lists
|
||||
exactly what needs to be done — treat it as the authoritative spec.
|
||||
|
||||
Work item title: ${item.title}
|
||||
Work item UUID: ${item.uuid}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. Read the work item description carefully — each numbered point is a
|
||||
required change.
|
||||
2. Implement every change in the repository. For dashboard changes, run
|
||||
`cd dashboard && npm run build` after each logical group to verify.
|
||||
3. Fix any build or lint errors before moving on.
|
||||
4. When all changes are in place and the build is green, commit everything
|
||||
with a clear message referencing the work item title.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not skip items. Do not add unrelated changes. Commit only when the
|
||||
build is clean.
|
||||
escalation:
|
||||
scope_exceeded: replan-spec-opus
|
||||
agent_bailed: direct-impl-sonnet
|
||||
128
task-templates/workflow/plan-review-loop@1.yaml
Normal file
128
task-templates/workflow/plan-review-loop@1.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
name: plan-review-loop
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
description: Opus + MiniMax review a plan, Sonnet revises, Haiku judges clean/rework
|
||||
runtime: code-sonnet-tdd-repo
|
||||
input:
|
||||
state: plan-drafted
|
||||
tags_required: []
|
||||
tags_forbidden: []
|
||||
required_artifacts: [plan_doc]
|
||||
output:
|
||||
state: plan-reviewed
|
||||
scope_budget:
|
||||
wall_clock_seconds_max: 7200 # WF-ITER-7: run-level ceiling across ALL iterations —
|
||||
# must be >= iterations_max * per_iteration_seconds_max
|
||||
# (5 * 1200 = 6000) plus slack; NOT a per-iteration value
|
||||
iterations_max: 5 # WF-SCH-19: required whenever loop is set
|
||||
per_iteration_seconds_max: 1200
|
||||
nodes:
|
||||
- id: review-opus
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: plan-review # M36 v0.6 (bug 69370eda fix)
|
||||
model: claude-opus-4
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "task/${item.uuid}"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Review the plan document for the following concept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
**Original concept**:
|
||||
${item.body}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Find and read the plan document referenced by this item completely
|
||||
3. Review it for CRITICAL and HIGH severity issues: wrong architecture,
|
||||
missing requirements, unaddressed security implications, unworkable
|
||||
sequencing
|
||||
4. Write your findings to /workspace/.agent-output/review-opus.md
|
||||
- id: review-minimax
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: plan-review
|
||||
model: minimax-m2
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "task/${item.uuid}"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Review the plan document for the following concept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
**Original concept**:
|
||||
${item.body}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Find and read the plan document referenced by this item completely
|
||||
3. Review it for CRITICAL and HIGH severity issues: wrong architecture,
|
||||
missing requirements, unaddressed security implications, unworkable
|
||||
sequencing
|
||||
4. Write your findings to /workspace/.agent-output/review-minimax.md
|
||||
- id: improve-sonnet
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: plan-review
|
||||
tier: coding
|
||||
depends_on: [review-opus, review-minimax]
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "task/${item.uuid}"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Revise the plan document for the following concept to address both
|
||||
reviews left on this branch.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Read /workspace/.agent-output/review-opus.md and
|
||||
/workspace/.agent-output/review-minimax.md
|
||||
3. Revise the plan document in place to address every CRITICAL/HIGH
|
||||
finding from both reviews
|
||||
4. Commit the revised plan on this branch
|
||||
- id: judge-haiku
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: plan-review
|
||||
model: claude-haiku-4
|
||||
depends_on: [improve-sonnet]
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "task/${item.uuid}"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Judge the revised plan document for the following concept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Read the revised plan document
|
||||
3. Check whether every CRITICAL/HIGH finding from
|
||||
/workspace/.agent-output/review-opus.md and
|
||||
/workspace/.agent-output/review-minimax.md has been addressed
|
||||
4. Write exactly CLEAN or NEEDS_REWORK (nothing else, no trailing
|
||||
punctuation or explanation) to /workspace/.workflow/verdict
|
||||
- id: judge-gate
|
||||
kind: script
|
||||
cmd: scripts/workflow/verdict-gate
|
||||
depends_on: [judge-haiku]
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
body: [review-opus, review-minimax, improve-sonnet, judge-haiku, judge-gate]
|
||||
condition_node: judge-gate
|
||||
on_max_reached: escalate
|
||||
escalation:
|
||||
scope_exceeded: replan-spec-opus
|
||||
loop_max_reached: replan-spec-opus # WF-SCH-19/WF-ITER-5: required whenever
|
||||
# on_max_reached is "escalate" (the default)
|
||||
137
task-templates/workflow/spec-review-loop@1.yaml
Normal file
137
task-templates/workflow/spec-review-loop@1.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
name: spec-review-loop
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Opus + MiniMax review a spec draft, Sonnet revises, Haiku judges clean/rework.
|
||||
Additive alternative to review-spec-arch-opus@1 / review-spec-arch-airouter@1 —
|
||||
those single-pass templates remain the default for the spec-draft state; a
|
||||
project opts into this loop instead via its own triggers.yaml, it does not
|
||||
replace them.
|
||||
runtime: code-sonnet-tdd-repo
|
||||
input:
|
||||
state: spec-draft
|
||||
tags_forbidden: [security-sensitive]
|
||||
required_artifacts: [spec_file]
|
||||
output:
|
||||
state: spec-reviewed-arch
|
||||
scope_budget:
|
||||
wall_clock_seconds_max: 7200 # must be >= iterations_max * per_iteration_seconds_max
|
||||
# (5 * 1200 = 6000) plus slack
|
||||
iterations_max: 5
|
||||
per_iteration_seconds_max: 1200
|
||||
nodes:
|
||||
- id: review-opus
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: spec-review # M36 v0.6 (bug 69370eda fix): per-node role replaces
|
||||
# the ungrounded top-level `runtime: review-loop-repo`.
|
||||
# Harness resolution: (role, model) → composite.
|
||||
model: claude-opus-4
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "spec/auto-draft"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Review the spec draft for the following concept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
**Original concept**:
|
||||
${item.body}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Find the spec file: ls spec/ and look for a file matching the concept title slug
|
||||
3. Read the spec file completely
|
||||
4. Review it against architectural best practices:
|
||||
- Are requirements testable and unambiguous?
|
||||
- Are there security implications not addressed?
|
||||
- Are interfaces and data contracts clearly defined?
|
||||
- Are edge cases and failure modes covered?
|
||||
5. Write your findings to /workspace/.agent-output/review-opus.md
|
||||
- id: review-minimax
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: spec-review
|
||||
model: minimax-m2
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "spec/auto-draft"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Review the spec draft for the following concept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
**Original concept**:
|
||||
${item.body}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Find the spec file: ls spec/ and look for a file matching the concept title slug
|
||||
3. Read the spec file completely
|
||||
4. Review it against architectural best practices:
|
||||
- Are requirements testable and unambiguous?
|
||||
- Are there security implications not addressed?
|
||||
- Are interfaces and data contracts clearly defined?
|
||||
- Are edge cases and failure modes covered?
|
||||
5. Write your findings to /workspace/.agent-output/review-minimax.md
|
||||
- id: improve-sonnet
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: spec-review
|
||||
tier: coding
|
||||
depends_on: [review-opus, review-minimax]
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "spec/auto-draft"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Revise the spec file for the following concept to address both reviews
|
||||
left on this branch.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Find the spec file: ls spec/ and look for a file matching the concept title slug
|
||||
3. Read /workspace/.agent-output/review-opus.md and
|
||||
/workspace/.agent-output/review-minimax.md
|
||||
4. Revise the spec file in place to address every finding from both reviews
|
||||
5. Commit the revised spec on this branch
|
||||
- id: judge-haiku
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: spec-review
|
||||
model: claude-haiku-4
|
||||
depends_on: [improve-sonnet]
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "spec/auto-draft"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Judge the revised spec file for the following concept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${item.title}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Find the spec file: ls spec/ and look for a file matching the concept title slug
|
||||
3. Check whether every finding from /workspace/.agent-output/review-opus.md
|
||||
and /workspace/.agent-output/review-minimax.md has been addressed
|
||||
4. Write exactly CLEAN or NEEDS_REWORK (nothing else, no trailing
|
||||
punctuation or explanation) to /workspace/.workflow/verdict
|
||||
- id: judge-gate
|
||||
kind: script
|
||||
cmd: scripts/workflow/verdict-gate
|
||||
depends_on: [judge-haiku]
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
body: [review-opus, review-minimax, improve-sonnet, judge-haiku, judge-gate]
|
||||
condition_node: judge-gate
|
||||
on_max_reached: escalate
|
||||
escalation:
|
||||
contract_ambiguous: review-spec-opus
|
||||
loop_max_reached: review-spec-opus
|
||||
68
task-templates/workflow/test-write-review-loop@1.yaml
Normal file
68
task-templates/workflow/test-write-review-loop@1.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
name: test-write-review-loop
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
MiniMax writes tests from skeletons, Sonnet reviews AND judges in one node
|
||||
(writes its own verdict file — no separate judge node), loop until clean.
|
||||
runtime: code-sonnet-tdd-repo
|
||||
input:
|
||||
state: needs-tests
|
||||
tags_required: [test-needed]
|
||||
required_artifacts: [test_file]
|
||||
output:
|
||||
state: test-write-pending
|
||||
scope_budget:
|
||||
wall_clock_seconds_max: 7200 # must be >= iterations_max * per_iteration_seconds_max
|
||||
# (5 * 1200 = 6000) plus slack
|
||||
iterations_max: 5
|
||||
per_iteration_seconds_max: 1200
|
||||
nodes:
|
||||
- id: write-minimax
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: test-write-review # M36 v0.6 (bug 69370eda fix): role + model replaces
|
||||
# the ungrounded `template: minimax-test-writer`
|
||||
# (a composite that never existed in the catalog).
|
||||
model: minimax-m2
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
# WF-COMP-15: stage agents share one per-item work branch so their work
|
||||
# accumulates across iterations.
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "task/${item.uuid}"
|
||||
- id: review-sonnet
|
||||
kind: agent
|
||||
role: test-write-review
|
||||
tier: coding
|
||||
depends_on: [write-minimax]
|
||||
runtime_env:
|
||||
AGENT_REPO_URL: "git@gitea.oreillyit.nz-ai-enablement:skynet/agent-runtimes-agents.git"
|
||||
AGENT_BRANCH: "task/${item.uuid}"
|
||||
prompt: |
|
||||
The agent-runtimes project repo is cloned at /workspace/project.
|
||||
Change to that directory before doing any work.
|
||||
|
||||
Review the tests just written for the following task.
|
||||
|
||||
**Title**: ${artifacts.item_title}
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. cd /workspace/project
|
||||
2. Review the newly-written test file(s) against the task's spec
|
||||
requirements and the test skeleton they were written from:
|
||||
- Do the tests actually exercise the required behaviour, not just
|
||||
call the code?
|
||||
- Are edge cases and failure modes covered?
|
||||
- Are assertions specific (not just "no exception raised")?
|
||||
- Do the tests pass against the current implementation?
|
||||
3. If the tests are inadequate, fix them directly on this branch —
|
||||
you are both reviewer and judge for this loop
|
||||
4. Write exactly CLEAN or NEEDS_REWORK (nothing else, no trailing
|
||||
punctuation or explanation) to /workspace/.workflow/verdict
|
||||
- id: review-gate
|
||||
kind: script
|
||||
cmd: scripts/workflow/verdict-gate
|
||||
depends_on: [review-sonnet]
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
body: [write-minimax, review-sonnet, review-gate]
|
||||
condition_node: review-gate
|
||||
on_max_reached: escalate
|
||||
escalation:
|
||||
loop_max_reached: fix-test-fixture-sonnet
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user